A comparison of two poems by Robert Frost: “Ghost House” and “A Cabin in the Clearing”

The counterbalance of the cardinal verses, soupcon field of operations is formally structured. It is made up of six stanzas, severally with five withdraws. It has a strict rhyme scheme the first, gage and kick the bucket lines of each stanza rhyme, as do the third and fourth part lines. This creates two neat rhyming couplets in each stanza, with the final line appearing disjointed as if it were an addition. This echoes the sentiments of belonging, in contrast with isolation and loneliness, that hoar expresses in the text. The tone of voice of this verse form is established immediately by the agnomen.Although it is a comm tho use phrase, and is also quite brief, the vocalizes Ghost House have uneasy and frightening implications. The poet has created an eerie mood in the poetry that is contributed to by the use of the fibber credit, the unk directn I. The question of who, or what, this character is has been intentionally left unanswered by Frost, as good as many oth er questions. This encourages the indorser to think more deep about the meter, as the answers ar non obvious, and in most cases not revealed at all.Unanswered questions instil in the reader a mavin of instability and confusion, which serves to enhance the atmosphere of the rime. As these are the feelings expressed by the fibber character, this creates empathy. The subject of the poem is the place where the storyteller lives, or dwells, and the belowstood folk that share it with him. Central to the poem is the fact that the house has vanished and that record has returned and reclaimed the land where it once was. The sense of the passage of time, and the inevitability of life, earthly concern and death, is a theme common to much of Frosts work.In this poem the reader is told that the house was destroyed many a summer ago. Although the flock surrounding the fate of the house are un fool, it is suggested that a natural adventure was the cause. Use of the reciprocation v anished implies that the house was destroyed suddenly, and the fact that it left no trace but the cellar walls suggests a disaster such as a fire, especially as the poem is set in the States where wooden houses are common. Imagery is apply, as a cellar in which the daylight falls is depicted, and the raspberries growing on the site are describe as purple-stemmed.These images involve the reader in the poem, and highlight the combination of mankind influences and nature that is happening. The reader is given the impression that nature is the controlling quarter in the situation, that nature is infinite and perpetual, and people are insignificant in comparison. While they may have made an impact on their environment, nature has quickly erased it, as the footpath down to the well is healed. The give voice healed is an emotive one as it has connotations of pain, implying that the footpath was a breach on the landscape that has now been relaxationored.It is a reminder of the fact that when we return it does not change the world nature carries on, and we are soon forgotten. passim the second stanza there are examples of the site returning to its natural state, as the woods come back and the trees grow freely again. in that respect is a sense of protection, with the use of the word shield to describe the grapevines growing over the fences. Nature is shown as a regenerative force as well as a destructive one. In the third stanza there is a repetition of the word vanished, referring to the house it is describe as a vanished abode.This reinforces the out-of-the-way situation of the narrator, that he lives in a house that does not exist. The narrator describes his strangely aching heart. This is a powerful reference, as the word aching describes a physical sensation, which is more effective than a stringently emotional one, and a sense of pain is indicated. There seems to be a connection among the narrator and the house, he relates how the house is linked to the recess of the world by a disused and forgotten road by chance indicating that this is how he feels, that his connection with the world has been destroyed, and that he himself is forgotten.Imagery is used throughout the poem, as Frost describes the area surrounding the house, and the stones out under the low-limbed tree, presumably gravestones, that have been covered by mosses so that the name calling cannot be read. This conveys a sense of mystery, as the reader is not cognizant to whom the stones belong. There are a number of themes that recur through the text. The last two stanzas are primarily concerned with the wordless folk, who live together the house. They are introduced abruptly, relatively late in the poem.They are mentioned casually, and it appears as if the narrator makes the surmise that the audience is already aware of their existence. This indicates that they are a persistent presence in the narrators life, and are a concern to him. It is not clear who, o r what, these people are, just as it is with the narrator. This sense of confusion is reenforce many times. There is an entire stanza devoted to the apparently irrelevant whippoorwill. This could be simply to create atmosphere, and to contrast with the shock of the next stanza in which the mute folk are introduced.The mute folk are described as tireless folk, but slow and sad with the contingent incomplete exception of two individuals, referred to only as lass and lad. It is possible that these two people are not as sad as the rest of their peers because they have a connection they belong to each other. matchless theme of the poem is loneliness and isolation. The house is described as alone(p) and the road as forgotten. The narrator is a lonely character, unaffectionate from the world and unable even to hand with the mute folk. It appears that the narrator has no home, that he does not belong anywhere.Even the house where he dwells is not described as his he calls it a house I know and does not claim that it belongs to him. It is assumed that the act of the poem refers to a house inhabited by ghosts, but it could refer to the ghost of the house or the memory of a time when the narrator had a home, and a sense of belonging. There is an eerie sense of death in the text. The word vanished is repeated, indicating a presence which was, but is no longer, there. The abruptness with which the house vanished leads to the assumption that death was involved that people died in a disaster of slightly kind.In the third stanza there is a reference to the night, often used as a metaphor for death. It is expressed simply as wickedness comes.. and this supports the suddenness of death in the poem. The narrator describes his environment as the unilluminated place. Although this could be a literal reference to the house, darkened now that night has fallen, it could also mean that the unlit place is death, and the fact that the mute folk share the place means that they are also dead. There is an obvious reference to death in the mention of the stones or gravestones.The second poem, A Cabin in the clear, has a similar tone to the first poem, and addresses similar issues. besides, the two poems have very different forms. In contrast to the structure and rhythm of Ghost House, the second poem appears to be constructed in a much more random way. This is partly due to the conversational style in which Frost has chosen to write. As a result of this there is no rhyme scheme to the poem, and no set stanza format. The poem is made up entirely of dialogue between two characters, mist and smoke.In the first poem the title influences the tone of the poem considerably as it affects the way that the rest of the poem is read. In the second poem the title is more vague, and although it sets the scene for the rest of the text it does not establish mood in the same way. The title of this poem uses the definite article the when referring to the clearing, and the indefinite article a when referring to the cabin. This places ferocity and importance on the clearing and detracts from the influence of the people on the landscape, as the cabin is manmade and the clearing is natural.The subject of this poem is the sleepers, presumably the inhabitants of the cabin in the clearing. They are present in the poem from the start, as the character of mist states, I dont believe the sleepers in this house know where they are. The two characters seem to hold different opinions of the sleepers, with mist appearing more accusative and demanding of them, while smoke is more clement. both(prenominal) narrators appear not to come across the actions of the people There are many similarities between the two poems. Both have narrator characters, and the perspective of these characters is the same.In Ghost House the narrator is an observer of the mute folk, while in the second poem the narrators are observers of the sleepers. However in the first poem there is only one narrator, who expresses one view, and in the second poem there are two narrators who express two different and slightly conflicting views. The narrators in the two poems have different attitudes towards the people that they are watching. In the first poem the reader is given the impression that the narrator would like to communicate with the mute folk but is unable to.In the second poem it seems as if the narrators could communicate with the sleepers if they wanted to, but they choose the role of observers voluntarily. However in both poems the narrators seem removed from the world of those they observe. In Ghost House this removal becomes isolation, and the audience is made to feel more sympathetic towards this narrator than the equivalent characters in A Cabin in the Clearing, as in this poem the narrators have a bond with each other, and are not as dependant on the sleepers